Screenshot 1 of 5: Catalog insights — DNA, coverage and sync readiness
Score — candidate comparison and market intelligence
Score
Deep analytics on what a record can become.
Deep analytics on progressions, master and release candidates, combined with market intelligence.
Who it's for, and what's in the way
Artist / Band
Room to make a body of work, and a clear line from it to a living.
- Endless tools and algorithm-shaped pressure crowd out the record you meant to make.
- Upload is treated as the finish line, so metadata gaps quietly strand royalties.
- Streams accumulate while per-stream income declines, and the numbers arrive late.
Engineer / Producer
Credit and payment that follow the work you actually did.
- Clearances and sample questions surface long after the idea was locked.
- Missing DSP credits mean attribution and mechanicals go elsewhere.
- Points and backend arrive months late, through pipelines you can't see.
Value for the persona
Candidate comparison
Line up mixes and masters side by side against market context, not gut feel.
Progression analysis
Harmonic, rhythmic and structural reads that explain why a version lands.
Market intelligence in the room
Where this record fits, who it competes with and what audience it can reach.
Defensible release calls
A shareable read that aligns artist, producer and label on the single.
Friction removed — from spark to streams
Single selection decided by the loudest opinion.
Evidence-backed comparison of release candidates.
Mix notes and market data live in separate worlds.
One analysis surface joining audio and audience.
Post-release learnings never loop back into production.
Performance feedback threaded back to the session.
Get access to Score
For artists, engineers and producers choosing between mixes, masters and release candidates with market context.